Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Lions vs. Saints Prediction, Odds, Pick For NFL Week 1

    US judge rules that Trump plan to halve FEMA workforce violated law

    SpaceX’s Nasdaq-100 weight set to more than double in rebalance

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest VKontakte
    Sg Latest NewsSg Latest News
    • Home
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • Sports
    Sg Latest NewsSg Latest News
    Home»Politics»US judge rules that Trump plan to halve FEMA workforce violated law
    Politics

    US judge rules that Trump plan to halve FEMA workforce violated law

    AdminBy AdminNo Comments
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    A person sits at a desk inside of a mobile FEMA command center after tornadoes ripped through several U.S. states in downtown Dawson Springs, Kentucky, December 14, 2021.

    Jon Cherry | Reuters

    A U.S. judge has ruled that the ​Trump administration broke the law by ordering the Federal Emergency Management Agency to cut its workforce in half.

    U.S. ‌District Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco in a decision issued late Friday said the U.S. Department of Homeland Security acted unlawfully by usurping FEMA’s authority over its own personnel and steering the agency to cut thousands of disaster-response jobs.

    While FEMA is part of DHS, a federal law adopted after Hurricane Katrina in ​2005 says the department “may not substantially or significantly reduce (FEMA’s) authorities, responsibilities, or functions.”

    Agreeing with unions that sued, Illston said ​the department violated the law when it moved last year to stop FEMA from renewing the temporary ⁠contracts of thousands of on-call reservists who respond to disasters.

    “There is no evidence in the record reflecting reasoned decision-making for this ​about-face or for the subsequent conditions DHS placed on FEMA’s renewal authority,” Illston wrote.

    Friday’s ruling did not include remedies or penalties. Illston, an ​appointee of President Bill Clinton, wrote those would be addressed in a separate ruling next month and said the parties may submit briefings on the scope of relief she should provide to the unions.

    FEMA and DHS did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Saturday.

    Democracy Forward, a left-leaning group that ​represents the plaintiffs in the case, applauded the ruling in a statement.

    “Congress created FEMA to operate with independence, given its mission to ​prepare and respond quickly when disasters arise,” said Skye Perryman, the group’s president and CEO.

    The unions in January amended a lawsuit they had filed ‌last year ⁠that more broadly challenged mass layoffs initiated by the Trump administration.

    The planned cuts at the emergency management agency are unlawful, the unions say, because they would undermine its core disaster‑response mission, were not approved by Congress, and were ordered by former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem rather than initiated within FEMA itself.

    The Trump administration has argued that FEMA has considerable flexibility to decide proper staffing levels. President ​Donald Trump previously has suggested that ​FEMA should be abolished and ⁠that states should be responsible for their emergency preparedness. Trump last year created a council to review the agency’s operations.

    Illston in June declined to immediately block the job cuts, finding that FEMA had at ​least temporarily backed away from its plans.

    But she wrote on Friday that FEMA appeared to be ​moving ahead with ⁠the cuts. FEMA projected its staffing levels for the upcoming fiscal year at 11,383 employees, or approximately half of prior levels, without any basis for choosing that number, Illston said.

    The judge in a separate decision also faulted FEMA and DHS officials for using the Signal messaging app ⁠on their ​personal cell phones to communicate about staffing cuts and deleting the messages.

    Illston said ​those messages would have been relevant to the lawsuit and that moving forward she would presume “that the lost Signal messages would have been unfavorable to Defendants because they ​would have been further evidence” of unlawful conduct.

    Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Admin
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Trump ally in Wisconsin sticks close to the president as Democrats push to flip swing district

    Trump says he would “love” a unified Ireland, as he kicks off visit that mixes diplomacy and golf

    Anthropic CEO urges AI companies to slow model development amid fears over misuse

    Data centers could be the next big market for catastrophe bonds

    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Editors Picks

    Singapore overtaken by Ningbo-Zhoushan as second busiest container port in H1

    As supply shocks multiply, monetary policy will shape corporate resilience

    Apple Watch Series 12 features leaked ahead of Apple’s fall event

    Sg Latest News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo YouTube
    • Get In Touch
    © 2026 SglatestNews. All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.