Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    The Brewers Keep Teaching Lessons; October’s Performance Will Be The Final Exam

    As midterms approach, Republican candidates weigh how closely to align with Trump

    More than 15,000 sign up for national accounting body’s AI programme in two months

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest VKontakte
    Sg Latest NewsSg Latest News
    • Home
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • Sports
    Sg Latest NewsSg Latest News
    Home»Politics»Judge rules Trump administration illegally punished AI firm Anthropic
    Politics

    Judge rules Trump administration illegally punished AI firm Anthropic

    AdminBy AdminNo Comments
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    A judge late Thursday permanently barred the Trump administration from enforcing a set of rules aimed at cutting off Anthropic from the federal government, ruling the administration had unconstitutionally punished the artificial intelligence company for protected speech.

    The ruling marks a victory for Anthropic in its monthslong legal battle against the administration over its push to impose guardrails on its powerful AI model Claude, which is used by the military. Anthropic sought to prevent Claude from being used for mass surveillance or fully autonomous weapons, but the military argued it should be allowed to use the model for all lawful purposes. 

    With the two sides unable to reach a deal, President Trump ordered federal agencies to stop using Claude earlier this year, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declared the firm a supply chain risk, aiming to prevent private defense contractors from using it to do work for the military. The administration argued those moves were necessary to safeguard national security.

    In her ruling Thursday, U.S. District Judge Rita Lin of San Francisco declared that those actions violated the First Amendment by punishing it for disagreeing with the government, calling them “unlawful retaliation against Anthropic for constitutionally protected expressive activities.” She also said the moves against Anthropic violated the company’s due process rights.

    Lin said her order does not require the government to use Anthropic or stop it from giving another AI firm its business, “so long as those actions are consistent with applicable regulations, statutes, and constitutional provisions.”

    “The government is certainly owed deference on weighty issues of national security,” Lin wrote in a 59-page opinion. “But Defendants’ contemporaneous words and deeds confirm that the challenged actions were based on a desire to make a public example out of Anthropic for its ‘arrogance’ in criticizing the government, not based on any articulable basis to believe that Anthropic would actually sabotage its model.”

    This is a breaking story; it will be updated.

    In:

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Admin
    • Website

    Related Posts

    As midterms approach, Republican candidates weigh how closely to align with Trump

    US FTC probes YouTube over social media policies, Bloomberg News reports

    CIA chief made Moscow trip to warn Russia not to attack NATO: Reports

    Fed Lisa Cook turns mortgage allegations back on Trump and his Cabinet

    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Editors Picks

    TikTok to pay $400 million to settle claims it violated children’s online privacy laws

    Malaysian Airlines pilots clear drug checks, cabin crew to be tested next

    Thailand’s Q2 GDP beats forecast as full-year outlook is raised 

    Sg Latest News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo YouTube
    • Get In Touch
    © 2026 SglatestNews. All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.