Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    The ACM Awards are nearly here with first-time host Shania Twain. Megan Moroney leads the nominees

    Top-10 Impact Freshmen Heading Into the 2026 College Football Season

    Why Were These C.E.O.s in Beijing With Trump?

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest VKontakte
    Sg Latest NewsSg Latest News
    • Home
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • Sports
    Sg Latest NewsSg Latest News
    Home»Politics»Judge blocks a Trump policy cutting off some social services for immigrants in the US illegally
    Politics

    Judge blocks a Trump policy cutting off some social services for immigrants in the US illegally

    AdminBy AdminNo Comments1 Min Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    A federal judge has blocked Trump administration restrictions on federally-funded services for immigrants in the country illegally, including the federal preschool program Head Start, health clinics and adult education

    A federal judge on Wednesday blocked Trump administration restrictions on services for immigrants in the country illegally, including the federal preschool program Head Start, health clinics and adult education.

    The order from the judge in U.S. District Court in Rhode Island applies to 20 states and the District of Columbia, whose attorneys general, all Democrats, sued the administration. It puts the administration’s interpretation of federal policy on hold while the case is decided.

    Individual public benefits, such as food stamps and college financial aid, have been largely unavailable to people in the country without legal status, but the new rules and guidance from the administration curbed their access to some community-level programs.

    The states’ lawsuit argued the government failed to follow the rulemaking process and did not provide the required notice on conditions placed on federal funds. It also argues that the changes will create significant harm.

    ___

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Admin
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Why Were These C.E.O.s in Beijing With Trump?

    YouTube, Snap and TikTok settle school district’s social media addiction claims

    Chinese EVs are coming to Canada, and dealers are eager to sell them

    Trump told Xi ‘I don’t talk about’ whether U.S. would defend Taiwan from China

    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Editors Picks

    Electrical fire to keep theater that hosts ‘The Book of Mormon’ closed through May 17

    The 2026 Grammy Award nominations are about be announced. Here’s what to know

    Disease of 1,000 faces shows how science is tackling immunity’s dark side

    Judge reverses Trump administration’s cuts of billions of dollars to Harvard University

    Top Reviews
    9.1

    Review: Mi 10 Mobile with Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 Mobile Platform

    By Admin
    8.9

    Comparison of Mobile Phone Providers: 4G Connectivity & Speed

    By Admin
    8.9

    Which LED Lights for Nail Salon Safe? Comparison of Major Brands

    By Admin
    Sg Latest News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo YouTube
    • Get In Touch
    © 2026 SglatestNews. All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.