Political parties should provide alternative perspectives and conduct themselves well, says the minister
[SINGAPORE] Political development is as critical as economic or social development, with “the right politics” being essential to preserve the social order and allow individuals and communities to flourish, said Coordinating Minister for Social Policies Ong Ye Kung in Parliament on Tuesday (Sep 23).
“Without the right politics, our society will be broken, and no amount of economic growth or government programmes will be able to put things right,” said Ong, who is also minister for health.
He added that Singapore’s political development will be influenced by how political parties play their respective roles.
In the debate on the President’s Address, he laid out lessons from the 2025 General Election.
First, Singaporeans value a stable and effective government that will safeguard their well-being, he said, noting that they “undoubtedly” voted with the uncertain global and economic environment in mind.
They thus chose a government with a track record of steering the country through crises, including the global financial crisis and the Covid-19 pandemic.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
“Given the global circumstances, I believe Singaporeans also want a government that not just takes care of domestic concerns, but also defends Singapore’s interests on the global stage, ensuring that Singapore stands tall among the community of nations.”
Second, Singapore’s political system is still evolving, Ong said. People are “judiciously balancing” between a decisive People’s Action Party (PAP) government and an opposition that provides an alternative voice and a check on the government.
He noted that following the 2025 General Election, the previous term’s parliamentary composition was maintained.
SEE ALSO
“I believe voters are saying to us: ‘Make this composition work for Singapore once again.’ Any future shift from this current composition will no doubt be carefully weighed by Singaporeans.”
The third lesson, Ong said, is that Singaporeans remain moderate and pragmatic, and they expect the same of the nation’s politics and politicians, with no “surge in populism”.
Ong denounced populists for being divisive and offering simplistic solutions to complex problems.
But he acknowledged that populism often arises from “genuine, understandable concerns”, such as social inequality or excessive competition for jobs and space from foreigners.
The PAP government must therefore be keenly aware of Singaporeans’ concerns, address them early, openly, and sensibly, and not let them feed populism, he said.
The final lesson is that Singaporeans are holding political parties to higher standards, and wanting “a contest of good ideas”, said Ong.
He called on political parties to make their different policy stances clear.
The Workers’ Party (WP) has done so “from time to time”, he noted. It has called for zero growth in foreign workers, while the PAP wants a controlled inflow.
The WP also prefers other direct taxes instead of the broad-based goods and services tax, and wants to spend more of the income from reserves on current Singaporeans, instead of equally dividing them between current and future generations.
But Ong called on the WP to “present a principled, consistent, and coherent approach to the main challenges facing Singapore”.
He concluded that political contests need not lead to an “all-out struggle” that entrenches division.
“The true test of a good system of governance lies in its ability to hold a diverse society together despite disagreements, thereby strengthening unity and cohesion,” he said. “To do this, society must get its politics right.”
Singaporeans should continue to be discerning, while parliamentarians should address local needs, play their roles as legislators, and act with integrity and honour.
Both sides of the House should come together for the “long-term endeavour to forge a strong system of governance”, he added.
